Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Department of Taxation

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The facts in this case are-not in substantial dispute. Appellant is a Delaware corporation, with-its-principal office and place of business in St. Paul, Minnesotá. It operates a factory at' Wausau, Wisconsin, manufacturing roofing granules. This factory began manufácturing operar tions in 1930. Sales are made through an office in Chicago but orders,are confirmed at the St. Paul office. When products so manufactured are sold, the remittances are made directly to the home office at St. Paul, and the funds from such sales are deposited in the general account of the appellant. Pay rolls, together…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Laabs v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State ex rel. Crucible Steel Casting Co. v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Spenle v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. NeillIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Department of Taxation v. Nash-Kelvinator Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. International Harvester Co. v. Wisconsin Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API