Legal Opinion

Goldfarb v. Cranin

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William R. Brennan, Jr., J.

Motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The action is for malpractice. The defendant, a dentist, sued in August, 1957, for professional services rendered to plaintiff herein. A default judgment was entered on February 3, 1958. The plaintiff, as defendant therein, appeared, answered, and interposed a counterclaim for injuries caused by the carelessness of the dentist, but did not appear at the trial.

A prior default judgment bars a subsequent suit on the issues which were, or could have been, determined in the earlier action (Goebel v. Iffla,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blair v. . BartlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Goebel v. . IfflaNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pace v. PerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Gianatasio v. D'AgostinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Mitchell v. Insurance of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  4. National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Estherville Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Heine v. Albin Gustafson Co.New York Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API