Legal Opinion
Gianatasio v. D'Agostino
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 22, 2012No. 11 Civ. 3095PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The defendants Mario D’Agostino, Persal, LLC d/b/a Muscle Maker Grill and Tirrenian Realty Corp. (the “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(c)(1) to dismiss the complaint (the “Complaint”) filed by plaintiff Robert Gianatasio (the “Plaintiff’) under the affirmative defenses of res judicata, collateral estoppel and the full faith and credit doctrine. Based upon the conclusions set forth below, Defendants’ motion is granted.
Facts & Prior Proceedings
The Court previously described the facts alleged in the Complaint as well as the case’s prior proceedings…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tobin v. GluckDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Kalter v. Riversource Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. VenturaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. VenturaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Brandon v. NPG Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.