Legal Opinion
Florida Peninsula Insurance Company v. Cespedes
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 17, 2014No. 2D12-4575PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
Maricela Cespedes brought an action against her property insurer, Florida Peninsula Insurance Company, for failure to pay benefits regarding her claim for sinkhole damages. Florida Peninsula moved for summary judgment arguing that Ms. Cespedes’ policy excluded sinkhole damage. Ms. Cespedes countered with a motion for partial summary judgment in which she argued that her homeowner’s insurance policy was ambiguous regarding sinkhole coverage. The trial court granted her motion and denied Florida Peninsula’s motion. Florida Peninsula filed a timely notice of appeal from the final…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Major League Baseball v. MorsaniSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- United States Fire Insurance v. J.S.U.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Washington National Insurance v. RudermanSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Kattoum v. New Hampshire Indem. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bioscience West, Inc. v. Gulfstream Property & Casualty Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. v. MARIELLE LYDEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- DOROTHY ARCHER v. TOWER HILL SIGNATURE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- Florida Peninsula Insurance Company v. CespedesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.