Legal Opinion

Rehm v. Rehm

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1968No. 68SC113Published

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Plaintiff respondent first contends that the General County Court of Buncombe County was without jurisdiction to hear defendant petitioner’s motion with respect to custody and support of the minor son of the parties, and the judgment entered by Judge Willson should be vacated. We do not agree.

Plaintiff respondent calls the Court’s attention to a portion of G.S. 7-296. This statute provides that:

“Judgments of the general county court may be enforced by execution issued by the clerk thereof, returnable within twenty *302days. Transcripts of such judgments may he docketed in the superior court as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Essex Investment Co. v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Becker v. BeckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Brooks v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API