Thompson v. State

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Reginald Thompson guilty of selling cocaine. Thompson appeals, alleging the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We find no error and affirm Thompson’s conviction.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to support the jury’s verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence; moreover, this Court determines evidence sufficiency and does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility.1 “Resolving evidentiary conflicts and inconsistencies, and assessing witness…