Legal Opinion

Jones v. Exchange Nat. Bank of Muskogee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 9, 1925No. 15277PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAY, C.

It is necessary to consider only three assignments of error: (1) That the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff's evidence; (2) that there was an abuse of discretion upon the part of the trial court in permitting a trial amendment to plaintiff’s petition, Which changed substantially the claim and defense; (3) that the judgment is not sustained by the evidence.

The plaintiff bank, in its petition, alleged that on the 29th day of January, 1923, it advanced and loaned to the defendant Minerva Jones the sum of $1,710.13, which was to be repaid…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Avery v. Jayhawker Gasoline Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Raymer v. Comley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Combs v. GoughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Sooner Pipe & Iron Co. v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. CosbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API