Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Glenn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1992Published

1Dissent

Green, J. P. (dissenting).

The presumption of knowing possession set forth in Penal Law § 220.25 (1) should not have been charged in this case. A criminal statutory presumption may be constitutionally applied only if "there is a 'rational connection’ between the basic facts that the prosecution proved and the ultimate fact presumed” (Ulster County Ct. v Allen, 442 US 140, 165, quoting Tot v United States, 319 US 463, 467). A rational connection between proven facts and facts that the jury is permitted to infer from them depends upon a "substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. People v. LeyvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. McCalebNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API