People v. Glenn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Green, J. P. (dissenting).
The presumption of knowing possession set forth in Penal Law § 220.25 (1) should not have been charged in this case. A criminal statutory presumption may be constitutionally applied only if "there is a 'rational connection’ between the basic facts that the prosecution proved and the ultimate fact presumed” (Ulster County Ct. v Allen, 442 US 140, 165, quoting Tot v United States, 319 US 463, 467). A rational connection between proven facts and facts that the jury is permitted to infer from them depends upon a "substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- People v. LeyvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. McCalebNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.