Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Curtis

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided September 1, 2010No. 12-09-00292-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice.

Bill Simpson and Kay Simpson appeal the trial court’s declaratory judgment in favor of Arden Charles Curtis and Shelby J. .Curtis. The Simpsons raise three issues on appeal. We modify the judgment and affirm, as modified.

Background

On October 12, 2006, the Curtises entered into an earnest money contract to sell the Simpsons approximately eight-five acres in rural Sabine County, Texas. The earnest money contract included the following provision:

F. RESERVATIONS: Seller reserves the following mineral, water, royalty, timber, or other interests: mineral

On…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Scott v. LiebmanTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Cunningham v. Parkdale BankTexas Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hydroscience Technologies, Inc v. Hydroscience, Inc, Whitehall Corp, Aviation Sales Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  2. Hardy v. BennefieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. Neil Edward Richmond, Mary Richmond Clark and James B. Richmond v. T.N. Wells and Vicki Wells, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2012
  4. Cade v. CosgroveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  5. R2 Restaurants, Inc. v. Mineola Community Bank, SSB, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API