Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Bonds

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1865PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from tbe Third Judicial District of the Territory of' Nevada, Lander County, Hon. P. B. Looee presiding. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tbe Third Judicial District of the Territory of' Nevada, Lander County, Hon. P. B. Looee presiding. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The appellant makes the following points: That the Court erred in charging the jury orally, and cites the following authorities: Section 355 of Criminal Practice Act, which is identical with section 362 of California Act as amended in 1855. (People v. Beebe, 6 Cal. 246; People v. Page, 8 Cal 341-4; People v. DeMerritb, 8 Cal. 423-4; People v. Ah Fong, 12 Cal. 345; Peoples. Wappner, 14 Cal. 43T; People v. Gharez, July…

1Concurrence

Opinion by

Beatty, J.,

full Bench concurring.

This was an indictment for murder. The defendant was tried and found guilty of murder in the- second degree, and judgment rendered in accordance with the verdict.

After the testimony closed, the Judge, on Ms motion, gave nine instructions, each and all of which were excepted to by the defendant. On the argument in this Coxu-t, no error in those instructions is pointed out or insisted on. They all appear. to be strictly in accordance-with law, as laid down in common law books and our statutes.

The defendant asked the Court for eight instructions in his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FisherMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Vincze v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. CytyNevada Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Harvey v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API