Legal Opinion

Harvey v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1962No. 4487PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

A jury found Harvey guilty of grand larceny. Judgment was duly entered upon the verdict and sentence imposed. He appeals. We believe the judgment of conviction must be reversed because of an error committed by the trial court while orally instructing the jury regarding the elements constituting the offense of grand larceny. A brief factual recitation will suffice for the purpose of focusing attention upon the mistake made.

Victor Havas, the complaining witness, operated a used-car business in Las Vegas. He had inherited certain items of jewelry which were kept…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. FisherMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. MilosovichNevada Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State v. ClarkeNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. FergusonNevada Supreme Court · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Valdez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Kuk v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Mears v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  4. DIAZ-LIZARRAGABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016
  5. Lopez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API