Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Keightley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1865PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from the Putnam Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.

The appellant instituted this proceeding to enjoin the appellees from issuing certain orders and bonds in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the County of Putnam, passed January 6th, 1865.

A demurrer filed to the complaint was sustained by the court, and the application was refused.

The appellant insists that the proceedings of the board of commissioners were void, because such action was had at a special session, and the members of the board had not been summoned as required by law.

The record shows the objection to be untrue. The notice-required by statute (1 G. &…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Comstock v. Hadlyme Ecclesiastical SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830
  2. Abendroth v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Board of Commissioners v. MarkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Harney v. Indianapolis, Crawfordsville, & Danville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Zuelly v. CasperIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API