Legal Opinion

Chudley v. USA (TV2)

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided June 30, 2021No. 3:18-cv-00172Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE TIMOTHY CHUDLEY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Nos.: 3:18-CV-172-TAV-HBG ) 3:14-CR-17-TAV-HBG-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner Timothy Chudley has filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

[Doc. 1]. The government has responded in opposition [Doc. 12]. Because, based on the record before the Court, it plainly appears that Petitioner is not entitled to relief, it is not necessary to hold an evidentiary hearing,1 and the motion will be DENIED. I.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API