Legal Opinion

McCasland v. Prather

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1978No. 3342Published

1Opinion of the Court

585 P.2d 336 (1978)

92 N.M. 192

Dallas McCASLAND, and Sims and McCasland, a partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Paul D. PRATHER, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 3342.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

September 26, 1978.

Glen L. Houston, Hobbs, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Maddox, Maddox & Cox, Hobbs, George J. Hopkins, Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellee.

OPINION

LOPEZ, Judge.

The plaintiffs sued the defendant for breach of contract to purchase acid, brine and fresh water and to enjoin future breaches of contract. The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for failure…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. International Erectors, Inc. v. Wilhoit Steel Erectors & Rental ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Superior Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. KemperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. McCasland v. PratherNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Kraftco Corp. v. KoblusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API