Legal Opinion

Smith, Etc. v. Markun

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1954No. 18,515PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoyse, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory-order of the Superior Court of Marion County, Room No. 3, granting appellees a temporary injunction against appellants.

The error properly assigned here is that the trial court erred in granting a temporary injunction to appellees. Goldsmith, et al. v. City of Indianapolis, et al. (1935), 208 Ind. 465, 466, 196 N. E. 525.

In view of the conclusion we have reached, it is necessary to consider only one of appellants’ contentions.

At the conclusion of appellees’ evidence in this case appellants moved for a finding in their favor because the appellees had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Michigan Cent. R.R. Co. v. Spindler, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Goldsmith v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eagle Aircraft, Inc. v. Anthony TrojnarIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. VerzeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Fineberg v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Teamsters Local 297 v. Air-Flow Sheet Metal, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Redmond v. United Airlines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API