State v. Hillock
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
These appeals 1 come to us after the appellants had been convicted of “night hunting”, 12 M.R.S.A. § 2455. The appeals (1) attack the sufficiency of the indictments; (2) attack the constitutionality, as applied, of 12 M.R.S.A. § 3051.1; and (3) attack the constitutionality of 12 M.R.S.A. § 3051.1 on its face.
In addition, numerous trial errors are alleged.
We deny the appeals.
The facts are not seriously in dispute. They may be summarized as follows:
Sometime in the evening of October 30, 1976, the appellants were seen riding in a truck on the Bog Road in Albion, Maine. Appellant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ChattleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. MorrisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WeeseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Schultz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- State v. DarlingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.