Brinkman v. Gilligan
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
This matter is once again before the Court pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States. The nature of that mandate is such that although five years and four appeals have intervened, all evidence presented must be reexamined in light of a standard enunciated by the Supreme Court, and plaintiffs’ cause of action must be reconsidered ab initio.
In accordance with instructions of the Supreme Court 1 an evidentiary hearing commenced November 1, 1977. Plaintiffs were given an opportunity to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Booker v. Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1978
- Liddell v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1979
- Alexander v. Youngstown Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
- Liddell v. BD. OF ED., CITY OF ST. LOUIS, ETC.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.