Legal Opinion

In Re Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 13, 1999No. S99Y0734PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The State Bar filed a Notice of Discipline against Respondent Edward Thomas Smith alleging violations of Standards 44 (wilful abandonment or disregard of a legal matter to the client’s detriment) and 68 (failure to respond to disciplinary authorities in accordance with disciplinary rules) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d). Upon Smith’s failure to respond to the Notice of Discipline within the time set by Bar Rule 4-208.3, Smith was in default and subject to discipline by this Court. The State Bar has recommended disbarment as an appropriate sanction for Smith’s violations. We have reviewed the record and…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re ZootaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. In Re ErionSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. In Re ErionSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. In Re MaplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  5. In Re MaplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API