Legal Opinion

In Re Zoota

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 12, 2000No. S00Y1230PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The State Bar filed a Formal Complaint against Respondent Herbert Alan Zoota, alleging violations of Standards 44 (wilfixl abandonment or disregard of a legal matter to the client’s detriment) and 68 (failure to respond to disciplinary authorities) of Rule 4-102 (d) of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia. Due to Zoota’s failure to respond to the complaint which had been properly served by publication pursuant to Bar Rule 4-203.1 (b) (3) (ii), the facts alleged therein were deemed admitted by the special master pursuant to Bar Rule 4-212 (a). Based on Zoota’s admissions by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. In re RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  3. In Re VossSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. In re KendallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  5. In the Matter of WoodardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  2. In the Matter of BeallSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. In Re ErionSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. In Re ErionSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. In Re ZootaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API