Legal Opinion

Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc. v. Faberge

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 22, 1982No. 80-5117Published

1Opinion of the Court

666 F.2d 393

214 U.S.P.Q. 44, 9 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1229

CHESEBROUGH-POND'S, INC., a corporation,

Plaintiff-counterdefendant-appellee,

v.

FABERGE, INCORPORATED, a corporation,

Defendant-counterclaimant-appellant.

No. 80-5117.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1981.

Decided Jan. 22, 1982.

William K. Rieber, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for defendant-counterclaimant-appellant; William G. Anderson, Fulwider, Patton, Rieber, Lee & Utecht, Los Angeles, Cal., Richard Whiting, Davis, Hoxie, Faithfull & Hapgood, New York City, on brief.

Richard A. Wallen, Harris, Kern,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Societe De Conditionnement en Aluminium v. Hunter Engineering Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Alpha Industries, Inc. v. Alpha Steel Tube & Shapes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API