Legal Opinion

Terrie Banhazl v. The American Ceramic Society

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 11, 2023No. 1:16-cv-10791Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * TERRIE BANHAZL d/b/a HEIRLOOM * CERAMICS, * * Plaintiff, * * Civil Action No. 16-cv-10791-ADB v. * * THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, * * Defendant. * * * ORDER BURROUGHS, D.J. Before the Court is Plaintiff Terrie Banhazl’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for prejudgment and post-judgment interest, future royalties, and further discovery. [ECF No. 168]. For the reasons set forth below the motion is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part.

35 U.S.C. § 284

provides that “[u]pon finding for the claimant the court shall award the claimant damages adequate to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
The Gyromat Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Champion Spark Plug Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant. Premix, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
Crowe v. BolducCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
Boston Gas Company v. Century IndemnityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.