Legal Opinion

Watson Electrical Construction Co. v. City of Winston-Salem

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1993No. 9221SC176Published

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

We note initially that this appeal is interlocutory as the judgment below did not resolve all disputes between all parties. However, it is our opinion that the appellants have a substantial right to have all their viable claims for relief heard by the same judge and jury, and therefore, we exercise our discretion to hear the appeals on their merits. Hoke v. E.F. Hutton and Co., 91 N.C. App. 159, 370 S.E.2d 857 (1988).

Both plaintiff and defendant P.J. Dick assign as error the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of the City. Summary judgment is proper where there is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ray Lackey Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Hinson v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Hoke v. EF HUTTON AND CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API