Legal Opinion
Atkinson v. Muskingum County Commissioners
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 22, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01642Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ERIC R. ATKINSON, Plaintiff, Civil Action 2:20-cv-1642 v. Judge James L. Graham Magistrate Judge Jolson MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al., Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 18). For the reasons that follow, the Undersigned RECOMMENDS Defendants’ Motion be GRANTED. Additionally, given this recommendation, Defendants’ Motion to Strike Reply to Response (Doc. 27), is DENIED as moot. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Eric…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.