In Re Pratt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MASTERSON, J.
At the conclusion of an evidentiary hearing, an able and experienced trial judge, applying well-established legal principles, granted Elmer Gerard Pratt’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. The basis for the ruling was that, under Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83 [83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215], Pratt had been deprived of evidence at his 1972 murder trial that would have “permitted potentially devastating cross-examination or other impeachment evidence” regarding prosecution witness Julius Butler, and that this deprivation undermined confidence in the verdict. On the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. SalazarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. VivarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- In Re Aaron CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In re DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.