Legal Opinion

In Re Pratt

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1999No. B113866PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MASTERSON, J.

At the conclusion of an evidentiary hearing, an able and experienced trial judge, applying well-established legal principles, granted Elmer Gerard Pratt’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. The basis for the ruling was that, under Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83 [83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215], Pratt had been deprived of evidence at his 1972 murder trial that would have “permitted potentially devastating cross-examination or other impeachment evidence” regarding prosecution witness Julius Butler, and that this deprivation undermined confidence in the verdict. On the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. SalazarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. VivarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. In Re Aaron CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. In re DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API