Legal Opinion
Comm'r of Labor & Ind. v. Whiting-Turner
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 23, 2019No. 30/18Published
1Opinion of the Court
Commissioner of Labor and Industry v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, No. 30, September Term 2018. Opinion by Hotten, J. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT – RECOGNIZED HAZARDS – SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE – The Court of Appeals held that there was substantial evidence before the Commissioner of Labor and Employment to conclude that the Whiting-Turner Contracting Company’s failure to install gooser braces and use of an undersized spacer beam during construction constituted recognized hazards in violation of Maryland Code, Labor and Employment Article, § 5-104(a). Circuit Court for Baltimore County Case…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bulluck v. Pelham Wood ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Baltimore Lutheran High School Ass'n v. Employment Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Gigeous v. Eastern Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Schwartz v. Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- F & H Coatings, LLC v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.