Legal Opinion
City of Philadelphia v. Tirrill
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 23, 2006No. 78 C.D. 2006PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
In this matter, Edie Tirrill and others1 (collectively, Occupants), ask this Court to determine whether they are entitled to a nunc pro tunc2 or “now for then” appeal *665from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) granting an injunction. Because Occupants failed to file a prompt application, however, we deny their request.
In June 2003, the City of Philadelphia (City) filed a complaint in equity seeking to enjoin Occupants from housing a Vietnamese Potbellied Pig in their residence. The City’s complaint alleged the Pig is a farm animal…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bass v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Criss v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Chalkey v. RoushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- West Penn Power Company v. GoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- B. Brown v. Allegheny County Bd. of Property Assess., Appeals and ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Baez v. Dept. of Transportation, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2011
- C. Patterson v. WCAB (SMX Staffing)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- D.E. Merriwether v. PennDOT, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- E. DiCicco v. Ciocca and A. Sellecchia v. City of Philadelphia ZBA ~ Appeal of: City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.