Legal Opinion

Katz v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 4, 1966No. 66 Civ. 497PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TYLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Howard Katz and David Baumann, seek to have this court convene a three-judge district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2282, 2283. They contend that the Universal Military Training and Service Act of 1948, 50 U.S.C. App. §§ 451-473 (hereinafter referred to as “UMTSA”) is unconstitutional and seek a declaratory judgment to that effect. Also, they have applied for injunctive relief against enforcement of UMTSA by the President, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of the Selective Service System.

To prevent the improvident granting of injunctions by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boyd v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Boyd v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API