Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 1985No. 2763PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, Judge:

This appeal is undertaken from judgment of sentence imposed after appellant was convicted by a jury and sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment of not less than four nor more than ten years for aggravated assault. At issue in this appeal is whether trial counsel was ineffective for introducing appellant’s prior incarceration into testimony and for failing to object to the trial court’s charge defining circumstantial evidence. Appellate counsel initially filed a Petition for Remission of the Record, but this court denied the petition and ordered counsel to submit a brief on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. EhrsamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. McKendrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. VerdekalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API