Legal Opinion
Great Western Sugar Co. v. Pennant Products, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 24, 1987No. 84CA0815PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
Defendant, Pennant Products, Inc., appeals the trial court judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, the Great Western Sugar Company. We affirm.
This dispute arises from two separate agreements between the parties whereby defendant contracted to purchase specified quantities of refined beet sugar from plaintiff. The first agreement (the fourth quarter contract) was to be performed during the fourth quarter of 1980, and the second agreement (the first quarter contract) was scheduled during the first quarter of 1981.
The fourth quarter contract called for the purchase of 900,000 lbs.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foxco Industries, Ltd. v. Fabric World, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- H.M.O. Systems, Inc. v. Choicecare Health Services, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Kniffin v. Colorado Western Development Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1980
- United States v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. New Jersey National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ballow v. PHICO Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Chaparral Resources, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Frontier Exploration, Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Chemco, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Chaparral Resources, Inc. v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988