Legal Opinion

United States v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1934No. 1036PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

Acting under the provisions of section 274 of the Revenue Act of 1924 (43 Stat. 297, 26 USCA §§ 1048-1051 notes, 1052, 1053 note, 1054), the Commissioner of Internal Revenue laid a deficiency income and excess profits tax of $210,810.56 for the year 1918 against the Amalgamated Sugar Company, hereinafter called the company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Utah, with its domicile at Ogden within that state. The company manufactures, refines, and sells beet sugar at wholesale. Throughout its existence it has consistently and uniformly kept its books…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Brown v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Servbest Foods, Inc. v. Emessee Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. United States v. Utah-Idaho Sugar Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  3. Gaddis v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1971
  4. Franklin County Distilling Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Great Western Sugar Co. v. Pennant Products, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API