Regents of the University of California v. LTI Flexible Products, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF Case No. 3:20-cv-08686-WHO CALIFORNIA, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 DISMISS AMENDED THIRD PARTY v. COMPLAINT 10 LTI FLEXIBLE PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 145 11 Defendants. 12 13 This protracted dispute involves claims of alleged patent infringement, fraudulent 14 concealment of patent ownership, and contract fraud, along with several parties that all have 15 somewhat conflicting versions of events. Initially, the Regents of the University of California 16 (“the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.