Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Markovich

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1992No. C4-91-1342PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

This wrongful death case involves the question of whether an employer is vicariously liable for an automobile accident caused when an employee lost control of his automobile due to his injection of cocaine. A jury found the driver was not acting within the scope and course of his employment at the time of the accident, and the trial court denied all post-trial motions. On appeal, the estate of the victim argues the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the employee’s deviation from the scope of employment. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

Thomas Markovich (driver) was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alholm v. WiltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Seivert v. BassSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Laurie v. MuellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Reliance Insurance Co. v. StackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Western National Mutual Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  3. Walker v. Scott CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Jason Blais v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API