Henson v. Bridgemans
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McKinney, J.:
In the chancery court a deposition was objected to and exceptions filed before the clerk and master on account of the deponent’s interest. The clerk and master sustained the exception, and the adverse party appealed from his decision to the chancellor.
The record does not show any disposition of the question by the chancellor; but the clerk certifies the depositions as having been read on the trial.
The objection as to interest was that the deponent had been a vendor of the land in dispute; but the record does not show that he was a vendor with general warranty. This is not a good…
2Cited by15 opinions
- GRANT CTY. FIRE PROT. DIST. v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. PuschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. GannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- F. R. Patch Manufacturing Co. v. Protection Lodge No. 215Supreme Court of Vermont · 1905
- Young v. ShanerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.