Legal Opinion

Hover v. Magley

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Demurrer to an answer in an action upon a promissory-note.

1Opinion of the CourtHasbrouck, J.

The plaintiff has brought suit upon a promissory note for $300, reading as follows:

“ 300.00 Linlithgo, April 4, 1904.

On demand for value received we jointly and severally promise to pay to Wilson W. Hover or order Three hundred dollars with interest.

“ (Signed) Lillian F. Maguey
“ Leonard Maguey.”

The defendant answers, among other things, that the note set forth was made by the defendant without any consideration therefor; that the plaintiff knew that there was never any consideration for said note, so far as the defendant was concerned, and that the note was given for a pre-existing debt of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sutherland v. MeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Roseman v. MahonyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Traders' Bank v. BradnerNew York Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perry v. RiskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Allied Furriers Corp. v. LiskerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API