Hover v. Magley
New York Supreme Court
Demurrer to an answer in an action upon a promissory-note.
1Opinion of the CourtHasbrouck, J.
The plaintiff has brought suit upon a promissory note for $300, reading as follows:
“ 300.00 Linlithgo, April 4, 1904.
On demand for value received we jointly and severally promise to pay to Wilson W. Hover or order Three hundred dollars with interest.
“ (Signed) Lillian F. Maguey
“ Leonard Maguey.”
The defendant answers, among other things, that the note set forth was made by the defendant without any consideration therefor; that the plaintiff knew that there was never any consideration for said note, so far as the defendant was concerned, and that the note was given for a pre-existing debt of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sutherland v. MeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Roseman v. MahonyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Traders' Bank v. BradnerNew York Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perry v. RiskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Allied Furriers Corp. v. LiskerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923