Legal Opinion

People v. Hyndman

California Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1893No. 20966PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

The defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree, and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion fora new trial.

The body of the information is as follows: “ William Hyndman is accused by the district attorney for the county of Nevada, state of California, by this information, of the crime of murder (a felony), committed as follows; The said William Hyndman on, to wit, the eighth day of July, 1892,. at and in the county of Nevada, and state of California, and prior to the filing of this information, wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously, and of his malice…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. People v. AlvisoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. State v. . BarnwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. WittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. SuesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State v. LundhighIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. NielsonMontana Supreme Court · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API