Legal Opinion

Cotner v. International Harvester Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 24, 1977No. 76-232PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellant Cotner sued International Harvester Company seeking to recover damages, alleging breach of warranties of merchantability and of fitness for a particular purpose on the sale of two new large 1972 model International Transtar trucks. He appeals from a judgment based upon a directed verdict in favor of appellee International Harvester Company. Appellant asserts five points for reversal. Since we feel that we must affirm the judgment upon one of these points, even assuming that appellant is correct on all the others, we will discuss that point only. It is:

THERE…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lynx, Inc. v. Ordnance Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Overland Bond & Investment Corp. v. HowardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. Dailey v. Holiday Distributing CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. LA Green Seed Company of Arkansas v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. MORRIS PLAN LEASING COMPANY v. Bingham Feed and Grain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Standard Alliance Industries, Inc. v. Black Clawson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. James Wilson, M. D., Ecg Systems, Inc. v. Marquette Electronics, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. T. J. Stevenson & Co. v. 81,193 Bags of FlourCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Wilcox v. Hillcrest Memorial Park of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  5. Williams v. Mozark Fire Extinguisher Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API