Legal Opinion

King v. Calhoun

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1958No. 8883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLADNEY, Judge.

The defendant has appealed from a default judgment. The sole contention of appellant, as we understand counsel’s brief, is directed at the sufficiency of the evidence adduced in proof of plaintiff’s demand.

The petition alleges merchandise valued at $365.55, as shown by an attached itemized account, was delivered to parties authorized by the defendant to receive it. The *536itemized account attached to the petition is accompanied by delivery or sales slips for each separately delivered item. Verification of the account was made by G. E. King by affidavit endorsed on the petition.

When…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merchants Adjustment Bureau v. MaltaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Martin v. District Grand Lodge No. 21 of the Grand United Order of Odd Fellows, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Harris v. WomackLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Brown v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. F. Strauss & Sons, Inc. v. Economy Cash GroceryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Williams Et Vir. v. Yelvington Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Harvey v. McMinnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Midland Discount Co. v. PhillipsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API