Midland Discount Co. v. Phillips

TATE, Judge.

The defendant husband appeals from default judgment obtained against him and his wife by the plaintiff finance company (Midland). We have previously dismissed the wife’s appeal as not timely taken. 196 *392So.2d 832, 833. (The defendants did not retain counsel until several months after the trial court judgment.)

The defendant-appellant, a maker of a promissory note sued upon, contends that the judgment on the note should be set aside and the case remanded for parol evidence to explain an inconsistent term reflected by the note.

The promissory note is in the amount of $1,344. It is…