Legal Opinion

Hill v. Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, LLC

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 2015No. 1140454Published

1Opinion of the Court

MAIN, Justice.

Fairfield Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC (“Fairfield”); D & N, LLC (“D & N”); DTD HC, LLC (“DTD”); Aurora Cares, LLC (alleged to be doing business, and herein sometimes referred to, as “Tara Cares”); and Aurora Healthcare, LLC (“Aurora”) (hereinafter sometimes referred to collectively as “the defendants”), petition this Court for a writ of mandamus, directing the trial court to vacate its February 6, 2015, order denying their “Motion to Quash Depositions and Motion for Protective Order, and Motion to Reconsider January 30, 2015[,] Order.”1 The defendants also request…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte the Boc Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. State v. LyonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Home Ins. Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Heisz v. Galt Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API