Legal Opinion

People v. Berrier

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 13, 2006No. 2-04-0418PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

Defendant, Randy Berrier, appeals his convictions of unlawful possession of a controlled substance (720 ILCS 570/402(c) (West 2002)) and criminal damage to property (720 ILCS 5/21 — l(l)(a) (West 2002)). On appeal, defendant argues that (1) the trial court abused its discretion in reopening proofs and allowing the State to produce additional expert testimony regarding the elements of unlawful possession of a controlled substance; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney reargued his motion for a directed verdict after the trial court’s initial ruling against him;…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. BeverlyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. People v. BanksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. People v. LoftonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  4. People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. People v. NowickiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API