Legal Opinion

Ruxton v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 2000No. CIV.A. 99-5929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HUTTON, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are Appellant Alfred and Denise Ruxton’s (“Appellants” or “Debtors”) Appeal from the Order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Honorable Stephen Raslavich, October 21, 1999 (Docket No. 3), Appellee the City of Philadelphia’s (“Appellee” or the “City”) response thereto (Docket No. 5), Appellants’ Motion to Strike Brief of Appellee (Docket No. 6), Appellee’s response thereto (Docket No. 7), and Appellants’ reply to Appellee’s response (Docket No. 8). For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. In Re Fred J. Szostek, Denise M. SzostekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Estate Of Roger LellockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. In Re ZimmermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2001
  3. In Re GeigerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API