Legal Opinion

(PS) Tyler v. 118th US Congress

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 29, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00404Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MATHEW TYLER, No. 2:25-cv-0404 DAD AC (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 118th US CONGRESS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff paid the filing fee and is proceeding in this matter pro se; pre-trial proceedings 18 are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff sues 19 various federal and state governmental entities and several California state officials. Defendant 20 New Hampshire Department of Justice moved to dismiss. ECF No. 15.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API