Legal Opinion

TMX Finance Corporate Services Inc v. Spicher

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided December 5, 2024No. 3:24-cv-02054Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TMX FINANCE CORPORATE § SERVICES, INC., § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. 3:24-CV-2054-N § WENDY SPICHER, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This Order addresses Defendant Wendy Spicher’s motion to dismiss [32]. The Court holds that abstention under the Younger doctrine is proper. Because the Court grants the motion to dismiss on abstention grounds, the Court does not reach the issues of personal jurisdiction or preclusion. I. ORIGINS OF THE MOTION TMX Finance Corporate Services, Inc. (“TMX FCS”)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API