Legal Opinion

State v. Pittman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 29, 2010No. A10A0277, A10A0278PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

In this criminal action alleging RICO 1 violations, the State in its appeal of the trial court’s grant of defendants’ special demurrer argues that the thirteen-page indictment adequately alleged the elements of the two RICO counts. Because the indictment set forth sufficient detail to withstand the special demurrer, we reverse.

In reviewing a ruling on a special demurrer, we apply a de novo standard of review because it is a question of law whether the allegations in the indictment are legally sufficient. See Geele v. State. 2 The indictment here alleged two RICO…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DelabyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Geele v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Bradford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CorhenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Doe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. State v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. CARR v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  5. Heather Kimbrough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API