State v. Pittman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.
In this criminal action alleging RICO 1 violations, the State in its appeal of the trial court’s grant of defendants’ special demurrer argues that the thirteen-page indictment adequately alleged the elements of the two RICO counts. Because the indictment set forth sufficient detail to withstand the special demurrer, we reverse.
In reviewing a ruling on a special demurrer, we apply a de novo standard of review because it is a question of law whether the allegations in the indictment are legally sufficient. See Geele v. State. 2 The indictment here alleged two RICO…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DelabyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Geele v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Bradford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CorhenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Doe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- State v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- CARR v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Heather Kimbrough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.