Legal Opinion

Doe v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 5, 2010No. A10A1793PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Curtis Lee Doe was convicted of attempting to influence the winning of a prize by tampering with lottery equipment in violation of the Georgia Lottery for Education Act. Doe appeals from the conviction entered on the verdict and the denial of his motion for a new trial, claiming (i) numerous errors related to what he claims was a defective indictment, (ii) that the criminal statute under which he was charged does not apply to his conduct, (iii) that there was a fatal variance between the indictment and the evidence adduced at trial, and (iv) that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. EubanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Delacruz v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. Hester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  4. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  3. Morris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Doe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  5. Scruggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API