Legal Opinion
Hazlett v. Suburban Tractor Co. (In Re Palmer)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 30, 2007No. Bankruptcy No. 05-64120. Adversary No. 06-2355PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON AMENDED MOTION OF DEERE & COMPANY FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOHN E. HOFFMAN, JR., United States Bankruptcy Judge.
Defendant Deere & Company (“Deere”) seeks summary judgment on the avoidance claims asserted against it by the Plaintiff, Thomas McK. Hazlett, Chapter 7 Trustee (“Hazlett” or “Trustee”), in his complaint (“Complaint”) (Doc. I). 1 Asserting the “strong-arm powers” granted by § 544(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee seeks to avoid what he claims is an unperfected security interest held by Deere in a compact utility tractor and front loader (“Equipment”) owned by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Bank & Trust Co. v. Spaeth (In Re Motorwerks, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Dymarkowski v. Savage (In re Hadley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015