Legal Opinion

Reveal v. Conner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Hamilton Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Suit against appellant and two others, charged as makers of a promissory note. Appellant answered in denial. Trial, finding and'judgment for the plaintiffs, over a motion for a new trial and in arrest.

There is but one point made in the brief of appellant, and that is, that the judgment should have been arrested, becausé *290the complaint was insufficient, in this, that neither the note nor a copy thereof was filed therewith; nor was it averred that a presentation of said note had been made, it being payable in bank.

So far as the complaint discloses, there is nothing showing that said Reveal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Price v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Bolster v. CatterlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Westfall v. StarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Scott v. ZartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Indianapolis & Madison Railroad v. SolomonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API