Legal Opinion
Jeum Chul Park v. Sandwich Chef, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 1994No. 93-CV-1381PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
Appellants Jeum Chul Park and her daughter, Hyun Park, plaintiffs below, appeal from the trial court’s award of counsel fees as sanctions for alleged violations of Super.Ct.Civ.R. 11. They claim that there was no evidentiary basis for the imposition of sanctions and that the trial judge’s findings were legally insufficient. We reject the first contention but agree in part with the second. Accordingly, we vacate the award and remand for further proceedings.
I
In a complaint filed on February 14, 1992, the Parks alleged that in August 1991, they approached Tom…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Martin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jonathan Woodner Co. v. BreedenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Pearson v. Soo ChungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re Estate of McKenneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ellipso, Inc. v. MannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Jackson v. ASA Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.