Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Soo Chung
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 2008No. 07-CV-872PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Associate Judge:
Appellant, Roy Pearson, who is an attorney, sued the Chungs, the owners of a dry cleaner called Custom Cleaners, alleging common law fraud and violations of the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”). His lawsuit was based upon signs that the Chungs displayed in their store stating “Satisfaction Guaranteed” and “Same Day Service.” At the conclusion of a bench trial, Judge Judith Bartnoff, in a well-reasoned opinion, found for the Chungs on all claims. Pearson argues that the trial court misapplied the law and erred in denying his motion for a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Harriet Alicke v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Rossman v. Fleet BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Flax v. SchertlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Saucier v. Countrywide Home LoansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Whiting v. AARP & Unitedhealthcare InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Krukas v. AARP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Jefferson v. CollinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.