Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Heffernan v. Smykal

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 21, 1957No. Gen. 46,868PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE SCHWARTZ

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendants appeal from an order sustaining plaintiff’s (relator’s) motion for judgment on the pleadings and ordering the issuance of a writ of mandamus against defendants, commanding them to reinstate plaintiff immediately to his position as a building inspector in the classified service of the Department of Buildings of the city of Chicago and to be paid his back salary at the rate of $5,382 per year for certain periods set forth in the order.

The first question to be considered is whether the complaint on its face states a cause of action. If…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Vestuto v. O'CONNORAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  2. In Re Public Ledger, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. People Ex Rel. Jendrick v. AllmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People Ex Rel. Walker v. O'CONNORAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  5. Marasco v. MorseNew York Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alberty v. DanielAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. People Ex Rel. Charles v. TelfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Rose v. Civil Service CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  4. Price v. Sanitary District of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  5. City of Tacoma v. Civil Service BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API